Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03050
Original file (BC 2013 03050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03050

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her AF Form 899, Request And Authorization For Permanent Change Of Station-Military (PCS orders), dated 10 May 13, be changed to authorize early dependent travel for her daughter, so she can file a travel voucher and be reimbursed for the cost of her daughter’s airfare to her new duty station.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR); due to her medical profile’s lifting restrictions, she should be able to file a travel voucher for her daughter’s airfare to her new duty station. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant currently serves in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman first class (E-3).

According to the AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 5 Nov 12, submitted by the applicant, she was on a medical profile with lifting restrictions.

The applicant received PCS orders dated 10 May 13 authorizing her PCS from Randolph AFB, TX, to Ellsworth AFB, SD with a report no later than date of 30 Jun 13 (Exhibit B).

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AF/A1PP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  In accordance with JFTR, U5201, B2b, a member is not authorized dependent travel and transportation allowances when a dependent travels at personal expense before a PCS order is issued or before receiving official notice that such an order was to be issued.  Based on the limited information presented by the applicant, there is no basis to change her current PCS orders.  

A complete copy of the AF/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 12 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03050 in Executive Session on 19 Jun 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Jun 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant’s AF Form 899 (PCS orders).
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AF/A1PP, dated 23 Apr 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 May 14.




                                   

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04911

    Original file (BC-2012-04911.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1PA recommends denial, stating, in part that in order for the applicant to receive the dependent allowances, the dependent must be "moving" in connection with the PCS from Sheppard AFB, TX to Maxwell-Gunter AFB, AL. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03022

    Original file (BC 2013 03022 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $1,293.13 to offset Temporary Lodging Expenses (TLE) incurred with her Permanent Change of Station (PCS) assignment to Ramstein Air Base (AB), Germany. A request was submitted to the Secretary of the Air Force Financial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02500

    Original file (BC 2013 02500.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02500 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the necessary documentation for approval of the personally procured move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG) during a permanent change of station (PCS) move. ECAF states the applicant indicates he should be reimbursed for three primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100149

    Original file (0100149.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. DPRCC states that the applicant was reimbursed for dependent travel based on cost comparison for mixed modes of travel. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, after thorough review of the evidence provided we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01867

    Original file (BC-2005-01867.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01867 INDEX CODE: 112.05 xxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE xxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO Mandatory Case Completion Date: 14 DEC 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to make him eligible for reimbursement for a personally procured move from Peterson AFB, Colorado to Buckley AFB, Colorado. DPDFP...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00198

    Original file (BC-2012-00198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DD Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent Change of Station – Military, be corrected to reflect his dependents address from Beale Air Force Base (AFB), California to Kadena (Okinawa) Air Base (AB), Japan. The applicant states he departed on 22 April 2011, but he advised Air Force Personnel Center Family Member Travel that he departed on 30 April 2011. The applicant purchased tickets for his dependents to travel to the United States at which time they went on a cruise.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0001128

    Original file (0001128.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01128 INDEX CODE: 128.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed in full for self-procured airline ticket cost from her technical training base located in San Antonio, Texas, to her new duty assignment in Great Falls, Montana. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02543

    Original file (BC-2011-02543.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02543 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His duty history and duty station be corrected to reflect Creech Air Force Base (AFB) so he can file his travel voucher for a low-cost permanent change of station (PCS) move. The applicant requests his duty history be corrected to reflect he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05412

    Original file (BC 2013 05412 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05412 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Permanent Change of Station (PCS) order AE-007654, dated 22 Oct 10, be amended to reflect deferment of dependent travel. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002432

    Original file (0002432.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02432 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for travel expenses incurred from a permanent change of station (PCS) from Kadena, Japan to Keesler AFB, MS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the...